The Irident dng files have (compared to an Iridenet created Tiff) the advantage of still being entirely flexible in terms of WB, color profile etc. The difference is probably half way between the 16MP X-Trans and the 24MP X-Trans converted by LR (which I have been using for 95% of my FUji files since 2012). Hm, I don't know yet but maybe in the future I will try to systematically process all RAF files to *.dng first, at import stage, and then edit as usual. So Irident program will overwrite the Tif? So that's destructive editing then. It will then overwrite the Tif that lightroom created so that it is already in the LR catalog. However, Iridient is smart enough to see that Tif file and find and load the DNG instead. I'm pretty sure it's down to IXT sharpening as I don't get the same when using PhotoNinja. I have to wonder if there are noise redux flags in the RAF that LR is silently respecting and Transformer not, which leads to a potentially much noiser look from Transformer because of htis. I'm wondering if this has to do with LR 'respecting' possible RAW flags dealing with NR, and Iridient not.įor instance, LR and C1 read RAFs differently when it comes to distortion, with LR applying some unseen distortion control that you can actually completely disable in C1 (and other raw programs). I guess I could load up another raw converter and look at two files set to NR=0, but I'm way too lazy for that I'm curious as to whether this is possible with noise reduction. I do too, but the problem is Fuji (along with others) still embed raw flags into their files.įor example, I have lens correction completely disabled, yet LR still reads the embedded lens profiles in the raw and applies them.without me being able to do anything about it. I know I turn NR to a minimum in the menu for the XT2, so there should be virtually no noise reduction hidden within in my RAF files. Lr CC/PS is excellent for portraits, people, street shots anyway.
#IRIDIENT DEVELOPER RAF SUPPORT ISO#
Normally for very low light/high ISO shots we are not dealing with landscapes, high frequency foliage/issues but more street scenes, portraits, people and functions and there is no need to convert with IXT. This is very powerful and as mentioned earlier in the thread, PS Smart Sharpening is quite sophisticated and can do more than Lr. My work flow is Lr CC in combo with PS and plugins. I think it is important to note that IXT is superb for about 90% of shots, but at high ISO's the work flow still need to be tested and adapted to. It's easy to lose sight of what an amazing step up this all is compared to the day when 400 ISO film was fast! Even the Lightroom version was actually still really good. In my above long post it would be easy for someone to miss an important point: the 6400 ISO image still looked amazing. At the end of the day, we now have some great tools in the tool kit for processing X-Trans files.
#IRIDIENT DEVELOPER RAF SUPPORT WINDOWS#
Iridient Developer in now available for Windows !!!.
0 kommentar(er)
